Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / PUBLIC POLICY AND PROMOTING INVENTIONS

PUBLIC POLICY AND PROMOTING INVENTIONS

-

1 Contrary to public policy and morality? Wanna bet?

The IPKat wonders whether Case T-140/02 Sportwetten GmbH Gera v OHIM, Intertops Sportwetten GmbH was posted on the Curia website today,even though it's dated yesterday. Intertops obtained registration of a figurative Community trade mark (CTM) containing the word INTERTOPS (above, right) for betting services in Class 42. Sportwetten, who had a German registration of the word mark INTERTOPS SPORTWETTEN, sought cancellation of the CTM on the ground that, since its proprietor was not licensed to provide such services in Germany, the registration of the mark was contrary to public policy and to accepted standards of morality. The application for cancellation was refused both by the Cancellation Division and by the Board of Appeal, which held that public policy and morality involve an examination of the inherent nature of a mark itself, not the actual or proposed circumstances of its use.

Sportwetten appealed to the Court of First Instance (CFI). The CFI dismissed the appeal, also
* refusing to declare that Intertops was barred from citing its CTM in German proceedings and

* refusing to order that a German Patent and Trade Mark Office decision, ordering that the INTERTOPS SPORTWETTEN mark be expunged from the register, be added to the file in these proceedings.
The IPKat thinks the CFI has got it right, but he's not sure anyone would want to bet on it ...


2 Invention promotion companies: highway robbers or knights in shining armour?

Further to the blog this morning on the Irish Patents Office's warning on companies that may prey on small-scale inventors, the IPKat is would like to know the following:
(i) What is the name of the American company that recently moved to Ireland, mentioned in the anonymous comment on the ealier blog? Can someone please let me have details, coordinates etc.

(ii) does anyone know of any invention promotion company that has a genuine track record of helping inventors commercialise their inventions?

(iii) should invention promotion companies be treated differently from companies that make it their business to assist in the development of brands, franchise formats, copyright-protected works and so on?

(iv) is this specifically an Anglo-American phenomenon, or is the invention promotion company found in other legal traditions too?
PUBLIC POLICY AND PROMOTING INVENTIONS PUBLIC POLICY AND PROMOTING INVENTIONS Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 Rating: 5

3 comments:

  1. AnonymousWednesday, 14 September 2005 at 19:43:00 GMT+1

    Dyson uk's website links to http://www.inventorlink.co.uk/

    I'm not sure of their record, but Dyson himself has been a fairly active campaigner for helping inventors to apply for patents.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousThursday, 15 September 2005 at 17:19:00 GMT+1

    Michael Harman writes:

    Re invention brokers, they also tended to appear in the business pages of Exchange and Mart, and they all used to operate from New Bond Street. A number of years ago it was known that the Fraud Squad was sniffing around one of them. In the US, they are regulated, and tend to get closed down if they are too bad. I think there were a couple of articles about them in the (US) Journal of the Patent Office Society some years back. The one you're asking about may be ITE.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Testing snippetSaturday, 29 October 2005 at 22:02:00 GMT+1

    (ii) does anyone know of any invention promotion company that has a genuine track record of helping inventors commercialise their inventions?
    Yes in Quebec! there is such an organization. I dont think that helps you much though.
    Anne Lazlo-Howard
    RushPRnews, press release services

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.