It's not the secret, silly!

The IPKat is shocked to discover from the BBC that US prosecutors have charged three people with stealing secrets from soft drinks company Coca-Cola which they tried to sell to its mortal rival PepsiCo. The report names three employees who allegedly took product samples and documents. PepsiCo cooperated with both the FBI and Coca-Cola after being contacted by someone looking to sell information.

Coca-Cola says the secret formula of its main drink - sold in the distinctive red and white cans - had not been compromised, but adds that it will be reviewing its security procedures. A PepsiCo spokesman said his company was happy to have helped its rival:
"Competition can sometimes be fierce, but also must be fair and legal".
The IPKat is impressed at PepsiCo's integrity, which it will doubtless make great play with when marketing its own product in future. Merpel adds, how silly to try to steal product secrets - the real treasure is the Coca-Cola brand itself. Anyone with access to a reasonable laboratory can analyse and replicate Coke's products, but the brand is literally irreplaceable.

Coca-Cola's recipe has allegedly been a trade secret for 120 years.

Read about the Coca-Cola formula here and here
Coke and dissolving teeth here
Coke and cocaine here
Popular Coke myths here
IT'S NOT THE SECRET, SILLY! IT'S NOT THE SECRET, SILLY! Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, July 06, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.