Ghana signs up for WIPO Copyright Treaty ...The IPKat notes that, on 18 August, the Republic of Ghana deposited its instrument of ratification of the 1996 WIPO Copyright Treaty with WIPO. That Treaty enters into force in Ghana on 18 November 2006.
Click here for writers and musicians from Ghana
... while Belgium opts for the PPTThe IPKat has also spotted that Kingdom of Belgium has deposited its instrument of ratification of the 1996 WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, subject to the following declaration:
"In accordance with Article 3(3) of the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), the Kingdom of Belgium declares that it avails itself of the faculty provided in Article 5(3) of the International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations (Rome Convention 1961) in the sense that it will not apply the criterion of publication as a point of attachment".At Belgium's request, that declaration is to be considered as having accompanied its instrument of ratification of the WPPT and entered into force last week, on 30 August.
Find a great Belgian performer here
A reminderIf you've signed up for next Monday's "How to Improve Your Intellectual Property Writing Skills" course but haven't yet received the advance materials, email Jeremy here. There are also still a few spaces available for anyone interested in this half-day course, which is a snip at £65 a head - as well as being a good deal of fun. Also, given the success of this year's courses, more are planned for next year. If you'd like details for now or for the future, just get in touch.
LATEST WIPO ACCESSIONS - AND A REMINDER
![LATEST WIPO ACCESSIONS - AND A REMINDER]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Monday, September 04, 2006
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html