Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / McCREEVY ON THE COMMUNITY PATENT

McCREEVY ON THE COMMUNITY PATENT


Commissioner Charlie McCreevy’s speech about the Community patent has provoked differing responses.

Heise Online accentuates the positive, reporting that the Commissioner noted the urgency of the need to create the CP and drew attention to the fact the ‘patchwork quilt’ network of different patent systems across Europe puts Europe at a competitive disadvantage, compared to the US and Japan.

The Commissioner ponders the desirability of the CP

However, the Register notes that the Commissioner acknowledged concerns about the CP that he described as ‘legitimate’, namely
‘cost of litigation under the EPLA, the impact of the rules of procedure which we have yet to see, the independence of the EPLA judges from the EPO.’
The IPKat reckons that the ultimate test will be the market: if/when the CP comes online, if business doesn’t like it, business won’t use it.
McCREEVY ON THE COMMUNITY PATENT McCREEVY ON THE COMMUNITY PATENT Reviewed by Anonymous on Friday, September 29, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousThursday, 5 October 2006 at 14:10:00 GMT+1

    That speech was mainly about the EPLA, not about the Community Patent. And the market can't decide whether or not to use it should the EPLA be ratified, since it will remove all national patent courts and replace them with a single European one.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.