Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / RINGTONE COPYRIGHT; OHIM ERROR

RINGTONE COPYRIGHT; OHIM ERROR


Not tone deaf

The Houston Chronicle reports that the Malaysian authorities have cracked down on mobile phone dealers who sold copyright-infringing mobile phone ringtones. Othman Nawang of the Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Ministry said that at least one-third of some 300 mobile phone outlets in the city were involved in the practice and noted that the subjects of the recent crackdown had been warned.

The IPKat wonders if any of his readers know if other jurisdictions have taken enforcement action in ringtone cases.


£££

OHIM wants your money. It really, really wants your money, so much so that it’s sending out renewal notices in respect of trade mark applications which have not proceeded to registration before the renewal date.

Okay, so as the OHIM website states, the cause is a technical error, not a desperate attempt to fill up to coffers ahead of the OHIM Christmas bash, but seriously, the IPKat notes that this means that there must be applications which are outstanding for 10 years.
RINGTONE COPYRIGHT; OHIM ERROR RINGTONE COPYRIGHT; OHIM ERROR Reviewed by Anonymous on Saturday, November 04, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousWednesday, 8 November 2006 at 15:46:00 GMT

    I remember Hong Kong has arrested people related to infringing ringtones a few years ago.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.