Patents spur innovation shock

New Scientist reports that an innovative process developed by researchers at Imperial College and University of London could benefit many more of the estimated 200 million people worldwide who suffer from Hepatitis C. The process was apparently developed specifically to get round patent protection owned by Hoffmann-La Roche and Schering Plough, who market an interferon drug that cures the disease, but is very expensive and therefore not generally available to many poorer people.

right: human interferon beta.

By avoiding the particular structure protected by the patents, the researchers managed to develop a new process for a much cheaper version of the drug, which performs just as well as the protected version.

The IPKat congratulates the researchers on their work, and wonders whether this is proof that patents really can spur genuine and useful innovation. Merpel wonders whether Hoffmann-La Roche and Schering Plough will also be in a congratulatory mood, or whether they will be considering their legal options on purposive construction and equivalents.
Patents spur innovation shock Patents spur innovation shock Reviewed by David Pearce on Tuesday, January 02, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.