INTA Report, Day 2: Monday 18 May

The first official fixture on the IPKat's list for the day was the Professors' Breakfast. Usually this event is an opportunity for a little harmless networking: each Professor at the Breakfast Table stands up and says who he or she is, everyone laughs politely and we all discuss the two eternal questions (What can we do for the INTA? What can the INTA do for us?). This year's format was different, the assembled academics being treated to presentations by David Gooder (Jack Daniel's) and Mike Yaghmai (eBay). David spoke about the problems posed by the counterfeit spirit industry and of the benefits derived from the formation of the International Federation of Spirit Producers (IFSP), while Mike waxed lyrical on the virtues of eBay's VeRO take-down scheme for suspected fake sales sites. Both presentations were of good quality, but were they a good idea?

Right: David Gooder (Jack Daniel's) lectures the professors

An official but unattributable source suggested that this was what the professors really and truly wanted, but the IPKat's own little survey suggests the opposite: IP professors are actually far happier talking than they are when they're listening, and they're happiest when they're talking to one another. INTA, please take note for next year! And don't forget the IPKat's yoghurt ...

The next big thing for the IPKat was the job of moderating the Professors' Panel session, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to Privilege and Ethics in Cyberspace and the Real World". He was fortunate to find a packed room humming with eager anticipation, three professors who knew their stuff and kept to the timetable, and three terrific topics to keep the serried masses on the edges of their comfy seats.  John T. Cross (left) explained what privilege was, how it did-or-didn't work, who was entitled to it, why trade mark practitioners other than fully qualified lawyers raise tricky issues, and why the AIPPI proposals on privileged communication with IP advisers are unlikely to be adopted.  David Hricik then spoke of the stringent and inconsistently-applied rules on ethics in the US as they affect investigations made by IP owners in contemplation of infringement litigation. Finally Tom Folsom launched into a provocative argument that, in cyberspace, it was more important to address infringement in terms of nailing down uses of words that misdirected or blocked off the flow of information than to mark out territories for exclusive use or control. 

After lunch the Kat crept into the cavernous Salon 6A, where he joined a disappointingly small audience in listening to three very positive and lively papers covering the current legal position in Chile (Juan Pablo Egana) and Brazil (Sandra Leis), as well as a round-up of the almost endless regional and international initiatives on IP enforcement in which Mexico has been involved in recent years (Martin Michaus).  No-one -- not even INTA -- can stop registrants wandering round the receptions and nibbling other people's peanuts for an hour and a quarter, or worshipping at the local shrine of Nordstrom. However, it does seem a shame that so much effort and expertise went into the preparation and delivery of some excellent current wisdom by a panel with nearly a century of practice between them, when so few of the 7,000+ INTA-ites were there to benefit from it. 

Two more treats were in store for the Kat. First, the 5th Annual Meet the Bloggers session, generously hosted at the Pier 70 Waterfront offices of local IP practice Graham & Dunn, thanks to Seattle Trademark Lawyer, blogger Michael Atkins. For three hours or more, seasoned intellectual property lawyers swapped cards, anecdotes and aspirations with enthusiastic neophytes, while those who were there for the sheer pleasure of it all could sip their ale while gazing wistfully out to sea (left).

Finally, the Kat paid his respects to this year's President, Richard Heath, who had thoughtfully combined his Silver Wedding Anniversary celebrations with this year's INTA Meeting so that he could make sure he had all his trade mark friends to celebrate with him Happy Anniversary, Mr and Mrs H, from all of us!
INTA Report, Day 2: Monday 18 May INTA Report, Day 2: Monday 18 May Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, May 19, 2009 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.