More on the European copyright licence

John Enser from Olswang has written to the IPKat with more on the pan-European copyright licence which the Kat noted earlier in the week. He wrote:
At a conference on Tuesday, Jean-Eric de Cockborne, Head of Audiovisual & Media Policy, denied that there was any truth at all in the New York Times report. The Commission is undertaking a study to consider whether there should be some changes to the present copyright licensing regime (and in particular the Coditel 2 principle that permits absolute territorial protection in "performance" licences) and the resulting country-by-country distribution structure with a view, in particular, to making it easier for nationals outside their home member states to receive programmes broadcast in their home member state, but at present no legislative proposal has been made and any decision will be a matter for the new Commission and Parliament once in place later in the year. Of course the same issue is also at stake in the case currently before the ECJ concerning the legality of the reception in pubs of foreign satellite transmissions.
Mysterious, says the IPKat. We'll have to wait to see how things pan out.
More on the European copyright licence More on the European copyright licence Reviewed by Unknown on Friday, May 08, 2009 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.