Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / Look-not-so-alikes / Pitchers: the new label

Pitchers: the new label

- ,
Further to the IPKat's earlier post on the settlement of the dispute between Diageo and Sainsbury's over the latter's emulation of a the Pimm's drink of the former, the IPKat would like to thank Paul Walsh (Bristows) for sending him the non-confidential version of Sainsbury's new label.

The old version appears on the right.

A side-by-side comparison of the two products which triggered the dispute in the first place can be viewed here.
Pitchers: the new label Pitchers: the new label Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, October 02, 2009 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. GuesstimateFriday, 2 October 2009 at 10:10:00 GMT+1

    Flash, bang, wallop, what a pitcher!

    (with apologies to Tommy Steele)

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.