• Obama calls USPTO “Embarrassing” – Last Thursday President Obama told the Forum on Modernizing Government that "believe it or not, in our patent office -- now, this is embarrassing -- this is an institution responsible for protecting and promoting innovation -- our patent office receives more than 80 percent of patent applications electronically, then manually prints them out, scans them, and enters them into an outdated case management system…” and that this was one of the reasons why the average patent processing time “is roughly three years.” There is much more to the reason for this long processing time than that and Kappos is working on this problem, says the AmeriKat, but still … Ouch!
• Snap! Kodak sues Apple and RIM – Also last Thursday Kodak announced that it has filed a patent infringement law suit with the US International Trade Commission (ITC) against Apple and RIM claiming that the camera technology used in Apple’s iPhone and RIM’s BlackBerry to preview images infringes their digital imaging patent. The complaint asks that specific mobile phones with digital cameras be excluded from import unless RIM and Apple compensate Kodak. Kodak has also filed civil claims in the US District Court for the Western District of New York. For further information see this report in CNET and the BBC here. 
• Apple fires back at Nokia - Last Friday Apple filed an ITC complaint against Nokia in the latest round of their ping-pong legal battle which seeks to ban the import of Nokia devices to the US. Last month Nokia filed a similar complaint with the ITC. As reported by Bloomberg, Nokia spokesperson Mark Durrant stated that “Nokia will study the complaint when it is received and continue to defend itself vigorously. However this does not alter the fact that Apple has failed to agree appropriate terms for using Nokia technology and has been seeking a free ride on Nokia’s innovation since it shipped the first iPhone in 2007.”See the AmeriKat’s previous posts on the battle here and here.
Letter from AmeriKat II: Bits 'n' Pieces
Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward
on
Monday, January 18, 2010
Rating:
Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward
on
Monday, January 18, 2010
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html