The catechysm of Kopimism: file-sharing in Sweden

This Kat is used to reading pop culture references describing sport and fashion as religious experiences. However, she did not expect to read that file-sharing had been labelled as a religion and that it had been recognised as such by a sovereign government. The Missionary Church of Kopimism was founded in 2010 by Swedish philosophy student and file sharer Mr Isak Gerson. After several attempts, just before Christmas 2011, the Swedish governmental agency Kammarkollegiet registered the Church of Kopimism as an official religious organisation of the state. According to a statement issued by the Church,
'information is holy and copying is a sacrament. Information holds a value, in itself and in what it contains, and the value multiplies through copying. Therefore, copying is central for the organisation and its members'. 
 Members 'worship what is the holiest of the holiest, information and copy'. The Church organises 'kopyactings', namely 'religious services where the kopimists share information with each other through copying and remix'. Further, CTRL+C and CTRL+V (the keyboard shortcuts for copy and paste) are held as sacred symbols.

Mr Gerson stated that the recognition of the Church was 'one step towards the day when we can live out our faith without fear of persecution'. Torrent Freak further reports that Mr Gerson 'hoped that the Church's religious beliefs would be considered in future lawmaking'.

Gustav Nipe, Chairman of the Church, also stated that the earlier failed attempts to have the Church recognised by the Swedish government 'might have something to do with the governmental organisations abiding by a very copyright friendly attitude, with a twisted view on copying'.

This Kat was unable to investigate the Church's website further. A message on its home page informed her that the site had been Slashdotted and urged those interested in joining to 'revisit us in a couple of days when the storm has settled'. However, she does observe that, on the information available to her, the Church does not appear to promote directly illegal file-sharing or pirating of copyright material.

The IPKat cannot help but ask: what do you think?

Merpel cheekily wonders whether according to the Church CTRL+Z (restore) would also be regarded as a sacred symbol which forgives 'sins' related to CTRL+X (cut) ...
The catechysm of Kopimism: file-sharing in Sweden The catechysm of Kopimism: file-sharing in Sweden Reviewed by Catherine Lee on Friday, January 06, 2012 Rating: 5


  1. nice faith, I'll hold a holy mass this saturday, celebrating the sacred acts of copying of a sacred text of a religion and a piece of music of my choice.

  2. I think this is hilarious. Humorous part aside, this points to where are developments of our civilization taking us next. It is not comforting that the lawyers are not educated so as to easily interpret these shifts. Legal profession seems to be lagging ever more behind the changes. I tried to address these shifts in my article
    The article deals exactly with the nature of copying and creating and comes to the conclusion that they are largely inseparable.

  3. Kharol: Yes! Do that!

    Copy and seed,
    Isak Gerson

  4. Well! An act which was bound to happen. Apple had its religious fervour, so why not these file sharers?

    An evolution to the current religions! Whats next - Worshiping Artificial Intelligence??


  5. Sing to the tune of 'All Things Bright and Beautiful':

    All things quite downloadable,
    All content far and near,
    Decrypted, ripped and shareable,
    Bittorrent brought them here!

    Each e-book we are reading,
    Each HD film we see,
    No DRM will stop us,
    Set information free!

    All things out of copyright,
    (And also stuff that's not),
    We'll never cease our sacred fight,
    To duplicate the lot!


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.