Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / IP Minister / Jeremy Phillips / Miscellany / triviia / Two Ministers: separated at birth -- and still the wrong way round?

Two Ministers: separated at birth -- and still the wrong way round?

- , , ,
Bishop Welby
Lord Younger
Not normally one to judge by appearances, or indeed even to notice them unless they're being registered as trade marks or meeting him for a pint of Badger at the Old Nick, this Kat was struck this morning when he spotted this picture on the left.  Was Viscount Younger, the United Kingdom's new Minister for Intellectual Property, also going to be installed next month as Archbishop of Canterbury?  If you peruse the two photographs, you too may appreciate the close resemblance of these near-contemporaries (Lord Younger was born in 1955, Justin Welby in 1956)

Alas, says this Kat, this is where the similarity between the two men ends.

The Archbishop-elect and symbolic head of the world's 75 million or so Anglicans, Justin Welby is currently Bishop of Durham -- but he has 11 years of business experience under his belt with Elf Aquitaine and Enterprise Oil plc.   The Parliament.UK biography of the new Minister for Intellectual Property does not however contain any reference to a track record in business, industry or commerce.

Merpel adds: it's a strange world.  Once upon a time, business experience and familiarity with the ways of the industrial world might be seen as assets in the armoury of a Minister responsible for what is, after all, an area of business and industry -- and the ability to produce hot air and pontificate were not unreasonably viewed as part of the skills set of any senior member of the clergy.  Now it seems to be quite the other way round ...

For the avoidance of doubt, both the IPKat and Merpel wish both men the best of luck in their respective posts, though they suspect they know which one will be in post the longer.
Two Ministers: separated at birth -- and still the wrong way round? Two Ministers: separated at birth -- and still the wrong way round? Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, January 10, 2013 Rating: 5

3 comments:

  1. AnonymousThursday, 10 January 2013 at 12:11:00 GMT

    There is some suggestion that Lord Younger has served as a director of a bank here but presumably that has been abandoned, but he does have children and they will need to sit on cheap copies of designer chairs so that's alright isn't it

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousThursday, 10 January 2013 at 17:15:00 GMT

    More to the point, "intellectual property" (unlike, say, localism, sports in schools, or the certainly very deserving cause of the War Widows Association) doesn't appear anywhere near the "political interests" of Viscount Younger in his short bio...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hans SachsThursday, 10 January 2013 at 17:46:00 GMT

    Lord Younger is older.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.