Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Design protection / event report / Fordham 2013 / indirect patent infringement / Jeremy Phillips / Fordham Focuses 10, 11 and 12: designs and indirect patent infringement

Fordham Focuses 10, 11 and 12: designs and indirect patent infringement

- , , , ,
To spare readers the intensive bombardment of Fordham IP blogposts to which they were subjected yesterday, posts on this morning's sessions on patent monetarisation, US and EU design protection and indirect patent infringement have been re-routed to specialist blogs which are related to the IPKat, as follows:
  • Patent monetarisation: on IP Finance here
  • US and EU design protection: on Class 99 here
  • Indirect patent infringement: on PatLit here
Fordham Focuses 10, 11 and 12: designs and indirect patent infringement Fordham Focuses 10, 11 and 12: designs and indirect patent infringement Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, April 05, 2013 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.