In the war of Cat nerd memes- who
would win?
|
In the IP war of the technology giants, there are the
battles fought to ascertain which design or patent was first [--in the UK,
it included deciding which
is the coolest], but let’s not forget the sister-battles (or
sibling squabbles? wonders Merpel) over claiming the ultimate trade mark rights
for the name APP STORE.
A little
bit of history on the worldwide APPSTORE battleground: once upon a time [on
July 11 2008 to be exact] Apple Inc. launched its APP STORE service to sell
applications for its mobile devices.
As is
usually the case in any clash of the IP titans, Apple did not remain as the
only fat cat in this sand box for long. On the other side of the pond [---aka
the Atlantic for European cats] Apple applied to register the APP
STORE mark with the U.S.P.T.O on July 17, 2008, which became the object of an
opposition filed in 2010 by Microsoft Corporation. The TTAB proceedings were
then stayed pending the outcome of an action filed in March 2011 by
Apple before the US District Court for the Northern District of California against
Amazon a few days after it officially launched its own “appstore”,
offering applications for use on smartphones running Google Inc.’s Android
platform.
On January
2, 2013 the
NDCA granted a partial motion for summary judgment in favor of Amazon on the
grounds that Apple had failed to establish that – as it had claimed – Amazon
made false statements of fact (express or implied) that qualify as false
advertisements under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act (reported here in detail by
the IPKat). This claim constituted the 5th cause of action
in the complaint filed by Apple which included [many other plot twists such
as] trademark infringement, dilution and unfair competition. Two years
later (July 9, 2013), Apple signed a covenant not to sue to Amazon and US
District Judge Hamilton dismissed the lawsuit. Thus in U.S courts, no decision
will ever be issued to reveal whether consumers will likely be confused over
competing smartphone app retail stores [-- whether they will also live
happily ever after with their smartphone or tablet of choice is another
story...].
While
keeping an eye on the TTAB opposition proceedings filed by Microsoft against
Apple on the grounds of genericness, this Kat is closely watching [-- how
appropriate with a surname meaning ‘the guard’] the parallel
Invalidity actions filed by Amazon, Microsoft & Co. against the
Community trade marks ‘APPSTORE’ and ‘APP STORE’ before OHIM as reported here.
The details of the respective claims and observations in reply can be found by inquiring minds on the scrolls kept in Alicante or in a more modern database here. Since the U.S. legal concept of ‘genericness’ is not recognized as such by CTM law, in Europe, the APP STORE trade marks were claimed to be registered in breach of Article 7 (1) b), c) and d) of the CTMR because they are descriptive and lack distinctive character or, in the alternative, they have become customary in the trade for services in Classes 35, 37, 38 and 42 including ‘operating online market places or buying, selling, and exchanging computer software and on demand applications’.
Grumpy Cat Knight or Dame |
The battle
thus far has primarily centered around linguistics [-- a curse for some
CTM knights and an enchantment for others]. For example: is the word APP
understood as ‘application’ in European countries? for the average European
English-speaking consumer does STORE only refer to a big retail shop at a
‘brick and mortar’ retail location - as claimed by Apple? To the vast delight
of the town folk, more than one pan-European survey was conducted on whether
APP STORE is identified with Apple services – to demonstrate ‘Acquired
distinctiveness’ within the meaning of Article 7 (3) CTMR and ultimately that
APP STORE has acquired secondary meaning because it was coined by Apple. Much
of this epic is yet to be written, thus we must leave it as “to be continued…”
‘Hear Ye,
Hear Ye’ – Meanwhile, in the not so-far away kingdom of Spain and
middle-earth’s next-door neighbour Australia,
APP STORE has been held as non-distinctive for application store services.
Last but
not least, this Kat would like to thank her fellow Cat woman associate for
giving her a paw for this post.
There’s an
app for that! on
the IPKat.
Appstore madness: fighting like two cats in a sack
Reviewed by Unknown
on
Monday, July 22, 2013
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html