Plaintiff Edith Windsor celebrates the ruling in front of the Supremt Court |
In addition to these benefits, a surviving same-sex spouse will now also be eligible under Section 17 USC 203 of the Copyright Act to terminate a prior transfer or license of the copyrighted work. The statue reads:
(2) Where an author is dead, his or her termination interest is owned, and may be exercised, as follows:As a result of Windsor, a “widow or widower” will now include surviving same-sex spouses if the couple had legally married in any state or foreign jurisdiction.
(A) The widow or widower owns the author's entire termination interest unless there are any surviving children or grandchildren of the author, in which case the widow or widower owns one-half of the author's interest.
(B) The author's surviving children, and the surviving children of any dead child of the author, own the author's entire termination interest unless there is a widow or widower, in which case the ownership of one-half of the author's interest is divided among them.
(C) The rights of the author's children and grandchildren are in all cases divided among them and exercised on a per stirpes basis according to the number of such author's children represented; the share of the children of a dead child in a termination interest can be exercised only by the action of a majority of them.
(D) In the event that the author's widow or widower, children, and grandchildren are not living, the author's executor, administrator, personal representative, or trustee shall own the author's entire termination interest.
From this perspective, the ruling is a win for IP rights by allowing all rights holders to ensure that their IP is able to be exploited by their spouses after their deaths. [In the words of the AmeriKat, “And we love economic value, don't we?” This Kat notes that the AmeriKat posted an excellent overview of recent UK studies on Orphan Works yesterday.]
Says Merpel, couples should probably also think about how the rights would be split or treated upon divorce… especially celebrities.
I have to say this slightly misses the point of same sex marriage doesn't it? The law as to inheritance of IP rights has not changed at all it seems to me. What has changed is who is eligible to marry. If new people become eligible to marry it is pretty obvious that the existing laws relating to married couples will apply to them.
ReplyDelete