Visual comparison between the album cover (left) and Cancellatura (right) |
3 comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
The "issue" as pertains the two parties may have reached an end, but can one say that the underlying legal issue has reached a conclusion?
ReplyDeleteI think not.
This is called Blackout Poetry (among other names) and it's ...well, rather common:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.pinterest.com/shutsko/text-art-blackout-poetry
I'm surprised it was an "issue" at all.
As to your question, I think the underlying legal issues could provide a lot of animated discussion, perhaps over a glass or two, black markers in hand.
Everyone seems at it. Even IPReg are having a go in their Nov and Oct 2017 minutes:
ReplyDeletehttps://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2018/01/FINAL-Minutes-of-Board-meeting-November-2017_Redacted.pdf
https://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2012/09/Minutes-of-Board-Meeting-Oct-2017_Redacted.pdf