 |
| Nothing quite like a Sunday afternoon nap... |
Looking for something to read after your Sunday nap? This Kat got you covered...
Patents
U.S. cases rarely delve into
international patent law issues. Rather,
US courts have largely refused to allow parallel proceedings or filings in
foreign jurisdictions to impact their decision-making at home. IBSA Institut
Biochimique, v. Teva Pharmaceuticals offers an interesting perspective on
this, PatentlyO
reported.
Trade marks
The Polish Supreme Court finally
decided that the famous Polish boxer Dariusz Michalczewski had won his case
against FoodCare sp. z o.o. for the “Tiger” trademark for popular energy
products. Kluwer
Trademark Blog reported on Dariusz Michalczewski’s victory.
Copyright
What happens if an employee
writes code in his “personal time”? In the decision, Penhallurick v
MD5 Limited, Hacon J suggested that such factors did not make a
difference when the nature of the work in question falls within the scope of
duties for which the employee is paid. Kluwer
Copyright Blog reported on the decision.
Our daily life is studded with
hints unveiling how the Internet is becoming a society within our society. Kluwer
Copyright Blog shared their thoughts on the evolving interaction
between EU copyright law and the Internet’s normativity.
Other: AI, Pharmaceutical register
The U.S. National Security
Commission, chaired by Eric Schmidt, has released its final report, over 750
pages, titled, National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence. The report outlines how the United States may be falling behind on certain
artificial intelligence research, particularly compared to China. IP
Finance reported on the report.
The Eurasian Patent Office
launched a Pharmaceutical Register, covering 8 jurisdictions, including Russia,
Belarus, Kazakhstan. Kluwer
Patent Blog reported on the register.
Reviewed by Magdaleen Jooste
on
Sunday, March 21, 2021
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html