Let's have a look at what the Kats were up to last week...
PATENTS
 |
| A very busy kat... |
The High Court decision in Illumina
v MGI hit the IP headlines for its application of the Supreme Court
decision in Regeneron v Kymab. Rose
Hughes brought part 2 of Illumina v MGI, “Has the UK lost its way on
the doctrine of equivalents?”, to you.
IPKat friends, Professor Peter Georg
Picht, and PhD student Erik Habich, from
the university of Zurich, share with us further insights on the German FRAND
approach here.
BOOK REVIEW
Anastasiia
Kyrylenko has once again had the pleasure to review a volume in the series
on intellectual property law, edited by Prof. Jacques de Werra at the Law
School of the University of Geneva. The particular volume to be reviewed,
titled “Intellectual Property in the Era of Big Data and Blockchain”, discusses
how these emerging technologies shape intellectual property law.
COPYRIGHT
The UK High Court has granted, for the first time, website blocking orders targeting cyberlocker and streamripping
sites/app and also considers that CJEU won’t follow the AG Opinion in the YouTube/Cyando
decision. Eleonora
Rosati reported on the blocking orders.
OTHER IP TOPICS: ASSIGNMENT
Trademark assignments and the transfer
of the goodwill seem, well, oh-so dull, until they are not. Kat friend Ian Gill
reports on a recent cautionary tale from the UK here.
Reviewed by Magdaleen Jooste
on
Sunday, March 07, 2021
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html