Conference on 'EU Copyright Law: State of Play and Future Directions' on 26 May

IPKat readers enjoying all things (EU) copyright may be interested to know that, on 26 May 2021, the Institute for Intellectual Property and Market Law (IFIM) at Stockholm University will be organizing a 1-day, online conference with myself and the authors of the individual chapters of my edited collection The Routledge Handbook of EU Copyright Law.

Topics of discussion will include:
  • Copyright and related rights: when does and should protection arise?
  • The scope of exclusive rights and liability for the doing of unauthorized acts
  • The state of copyright exceptions and limitations
  • Copyright enforcement: the technological and cross-border dimensions
  • The law and policy of EU harmonization and the role of the CJEU
Attendance is free, but registration is required. If you are interested in this event, please see more information, including the conference programme, and register here.

Registered participants will be emailed the Zoom joining instructions the day before the conference.

I would like to take the opportunity to also thank talented and enthusiastic LLM students Alexandre Zanatta Miura and Riana Harvey (also a GuestKat) for their help in organizing this event.
Conference on 'EU Copyright Law: State of Play and Future Directions' on 26 May Conference on 'EU Copyright Law: State of Play and Future Directions' on 26 May Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Monday, March 22, 2021 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.