Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week

This Kat wants you to admire her whiskers
 Why not round off Eastertime with an IPKat roundup?


Book review editor Hayleigh Bosher published a comprehensive review of the latest edition of Copinger & Skone James on Copyright, highlighting its usefulness to practitioners and researchers alike.


GuestKat Rose Hughes provided an update on recent criticism of the EPO for its conduct surrounding proceedings challenging the legality of making oral proceedings via video conferencing mandatory for all parties, especially the speed with which the Enlarged Board of Appeal has scheduled the hearing date for the referral.

Kat readers with an interest in SEP licensing and injunctions will be heartened to hear of the IPKat/LSE joint event on the subject being held on 21 April 2021 with a panel of experts, as announced last week. It will consider the questions to be considered before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) following the Düsseldorf regional court's referral in Nokia v Daimler.


Katfriends Irene Calboli and Jacques de Werra attended the Third IP & Innovation Researchers of Asia (IPIRA) Conference, this year held online and covering a wide variety of topics, including plenary sessions on 'Intellectual Property and Innovation during and after COVID-19' and 'The Impact of IP Teaching and Researching on Public Policy'. 

Photo by Krysten Merriman from Pexels
Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week Reviewed by Sophie Corke on Sunday, April 11, 2021 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.