It's the most wonderful tiiime of the yeaaarrr... time, of course, to vote for your favourite intellectual property law books of 2022!
The IPKat team continue to diligently read and review as many brilliant IP books as possible, of which there are many, for the Kat community. But there can be only one winner (per category) of this prestigious prize, so vote wisely. As always, readers can vote for books in five categories: Patents, Copyright (includes Performer's Rights), Trade Mark (includes Geographical Indications), Design and Intellectual Property (any book that covers more than one type of IP).
This annual occasion, now in its fith year, allows the IPKat community to celebrate and congratulate those who have contributed to the IP literature. You can check out the previous nominees and winners here.
Vote for your favourite IP book of 2022 by taking the survey here
And PLEASE, FOR THE LOVE OF IP, only complete the survey once! Although it may be tempting to submit 94 votes for your (own) favourite book, this will be a fruitless endeavour as we will only count your vote once from our side. Thank you for playing nicely.
Only votes for books published in 2022 will count.
Please provide the editor/author's name and title of the book in your votes.
Voting will close at midnight on 31st December 2022,
winners will be announced in the new year.
Good luck!
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Thursday, December 01, 2022
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn ![[Guest post] Can AI be considered a PHOSITA? Policy debates in the US and the EU](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggxDO6mW5r4n3-06Af5ckmIaMIhzgPJBoDP8AUsSYXY2zajUQt1ObGVn_GhCgidbG_YDVnybQuJ5XoAjjBG9Ws2xJWDQHNPMrLkn526SWIG371X_Kjt1E8tJmn8Ae_20Phyphenhyphen09JeuUOhhTR3aZE9lMRQlqHGQGcAWGxlo91rrKcLk0AfUjWCvw6RQ/s72-c/Two-cats-eating.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html