 |
| A remarkably focused Kat |
Copyright
Kateryna Militsyna and Liubov Maidanyk unpacked the major legislative changes brought by the new Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights, adopted in December 2022.Neil Wilkof focused on the phenomenon of the cross-media franchise. This phenomenon illustrates the commercial potential of derivative works within the copyright system. In his post, Neil chose to develop his point through one of the first cross-media franchises in Germany, Lulu.
Trade marks
Marcel Pemsel wondered how to cancel degenerated trade marks. Marcel illustrated his point with the example of the German trade mark “Black Friday”.Nedim Malovic analysed a recent decision of the EUIPO regarding the registration of Charlie Chaplin’s character “Charlot” as an EU trade mark (EUTM). The EUIPO upheld the Office’s objections after having established that the figurative depiction of Charlot is not eligible for EU trade mark registration.
Patents
Rose Hughes examined the decision in T-0605/20 issued by the Board of Appeal on 11 November 2022. The Board of Appeal considered the risks posed by hindsight in inventive step analysis where part of the invention is identification of the problem to be solved.Other
Chijioke Okorie focused on identifying the principles that should guide African governments in realising the right to research in Africa.Anastasiia Kyrylenko provided a review of “A Practitioner’s Guide to European Patent Law: For National Practice and the Unified Patent Court” authored by Paul England. Most of the chapters of this book cover core issues of patent law. This includes patentability criteria, the person skilled in the art, patent claims, and supplementary protection certificates.
Hayleigh Bosher announced the IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2022 winners.
Never too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
on
Thursday, January 26, 2023
Rating:
Reviewed by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
on
Thursday, January 26, 2023
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html