Dive into the latest intellectual property updates with the IPKat!
Copyright and Trade marks![]() |
| Our dedicated Kat, hard at work sifting through the latest IP news! |
Jocelyn Bosse commented on the EU General Court's decision to uphold the invalidity of the "ICELAND" trademarks for the British supermarket chain, finding them geographically descriptive of the nation of Iceland, and reiterating settled EU case law on geographically descriptive names, including country names, and their potential future associations with goods and services.
Marcel Pemsel examined the General Court's decision to annul the revocation of Ferrari’s ‘TESTAROSSA’ trademark, finding that the sale of second-hand cars by authorized dealers constitutes genuine use and that use of the mark for directly connected services, parts, and accessories is also sufficient to demonstrate genuine use, applying and expanding upon the CJEU’s prior Ferrari judgment.
Patents
Rose Hughes discussed the EPO Boards of Appeal's decision T 1065/23 concerning product-by-process claims, which confirmed that patentability hinges on whether the process imparts unique and non-obvious properties to the final product, and reiterated that the format of a granted claim cannot be challenged for lack of clarity in opposition proceedings.
IP Events and Opportunities
Oliver Fairhurst provided a weekly update covering intellectual property news, consultations, and events, including the UK IPO's SEP consultation, INTA's IP, Finance, and Valuation Workshop Series, IP Inclusive's 10th-anniversary impact report, and a warning from the UKIPO regarding counterfeit flea treatments.
Image credit: Gemini AI
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi
on
Tuesday, July 22, 2025
Rating:
Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi
on
Tuesday, July 22, 2025
Rating:



No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html