Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Home / #NeverTooLate / Asude Sena Moya / copyright / events / patents / trade marks / Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

- , , , , ,

Here’s a quick recap of last week’s highlights from The IPKat!

Patents

Rose Hughes discussed a Board of Appeal decision (T 1561/23) concerning claim interpretation.

Copyright

Söğüt Atilla analysed a decision of a US Court of Appeals concerning a collection of Ford Mustangs (called ‘Eleanor’) featured across four films by Denice Halicki.

Trade Marks

Marcel Pemsel explained a recent decision of the General Court regarding likelihood of confusion.

Oliver Fairhurst reported on the recent judgment in WISE Payments Ltd v With Wise Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 1722 (IPEC).

IP events and opportunities

Söğüt Atilla shared upcoming IP news, events, and opportunities. Les Pan-European Conference will be held on 29-30 September 2025. EUIPO will host a conference on 20-21 November 2025. For more IP news, check here.

Rose Hughes informed the Readers of a consultation on Standard Essential Patents, recently launched by the UK Government.
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Reviewed by Asude Sena Moya on Wednesday, July 16, 2025 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.