Here is this week's miscellany. Remember to check the IPKat Events page to keep up to date with upcoming events.
Kibble
UKIPO vote on 'most iconic trade mark'
To celebrate the UK's trade mark register's 150th birthday, the UKIPO is holding a poll for the most iconic trade mark. One lucky winner could get a fancy new line to put in their cease and desist letters. Vote here.
What better way to show your love for trade marks, specifically and in general. In other news, please see UK trade mark number 908150286. Could this be like when Rage Against The Machine got the Christmas No.1?
Events
UCL lecture on Music, Copyright, and Contracts in the Age of AI: Out of Tune or Perfect Harmony?
City Law School event on UK and EU copyright
Another chance to hear from Arnold LJ, this time on the (respective...?) merits of UK and EU copyright law, at 17:00-18:30 on 26 February 2026 at The City Law School in London. Free to attend. Register here.
The Nordic Copyright Symposium 2026
The 20th Nordic Copyright Symposium is being held in Reykjavik on 2-4 September 2026. Details here.
Opportunities
School of Law of the University of Geneva (UNIGE)
UNIGE has announced a call for applications for the IP Researchers Europe Conference (IPRE) 2026, which will be held in collaboration with WIPO and the WTO in Geneva on 18-19 June 2026. Details here. Deadline to submit is 16 March 2026.
Friday Fantasies
Reviewed by Oliver Fairhurst
on
Friday, January 30, 2026
Rating:
Reviewed by Oliver Fairhurst
on
Friday, January 30, 2026
Rating:



No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html