If you found last week's intellectual property developments a bit too heavy to lift all at once, let the Kat help lighten the load with this curated summary.
| Cheese, high heels, and AI scrapers: this Kat scrutinises the week's diverse docket. |
Book Review
Wissam Bentazar provided an immersive review of the new book Fashion and Intellectual Property. The volume explores fashion as a complex cultural system, examining how IP law interacts with everything from luxury goods and upcycling to cultural appropriation and the functionality of garments.
Copyright
Georgia Jenkins delved into the escalating war over data access for AI. She examined Google’s lawsuit against SerpApi for scraping search result pages (SERPs), highlighting Google's strategic pivot to relying on technological protection measures (TPMs) to control access to its infrastructure and data, a move paralleling the Reddit v. Perplexity litigation.
Oliver Fairhurst updated us on the ongoing saga of Getty Images v Stability AI. Permission to appeal has been granted on the critical issue of secondary copyright infringement—specifically whether Stable Diffusion constitutes an "infringing copy"—and Stability will seek permission from the Court of Appeal regarding the adverse trade mark findings.
Designs
Trademarks
IP Events and Opportunities
Image credit: Gemini AI


No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html