The team is joined by GuestKats Mirko Brüß, Rosie Burbidge, Nedim Malovic, Frantzeska Papadopolou, Mathilde Pavis, and Eibhlin Vardy
InternKats: Rose Hughes, Ieva Giedrimaite, and Cecilia Sbrolli
SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Hayleigh Bosher (Book Review Editor), and Tian Lu (Asia Correspondent).

Tuesday, 16 August 2005


The IPKat has been trying to avoid making any comment on the Apple/Microsoft spat over the so-called "iPod patent", if only because it seems to have been so over-exposed in the media. However, so many people have been asking him for his comment that he feels compelled to break his silence.

First, he is astonished at how a simple story can be so swiftly distorted by the media. What started off as a simple tale of an Apple patent application being refused by the US Patent and Trademark Office because an earlier Microsoft application appeared to anticipate it has now become, according to some, Microsoft having an iPod patent which will enable it to extract billions of dollars from Apple (and others) for the manufacture of MP3 players.

The best account the IPKat has read is that contained in The Register, drawing on a piece in AppleInsider. He encourages his readers to take a look.

The AppleInsider story says the Apple application "to patent the menu-based software interface of its popular iPod digital music player has ultimately proved unsuccessful". The Register points out that this isn't the case and that several key aspects of the iPod are adequately covered by separate Apple IP applications.

The Register concludes by linking to Channel Register, which cites two infringement suits that Apple is facing over the iPod, one from Hong Kong-based Pat-rights (arising from its US patent number 6,665,797, which covers the provision of “identity information of the rightful user thereof for accessing a network central computer to obtain service(s) or software product(s) or alike”), which it maintains is infringed by Apple’s Fairplay digital rights management system. Pat-rights seeks 12% of profits earned by Apple's iTunes and iPod sales. The second suit, which has already been filed in a US federal court, charges Apple with infringing Chicago-based Advanced Audio Devices' US patent 6,587,403, which was granted in July 2003 and relates to “a music jukebox which is configured for storing a music library therein”.

The IPKat is sure that, given the tendency of US companies to drift easily into licensing and cross-licensing agreements, Apple will not face any obstacle in the continued manufacture of its highly popular (if overpriced) MP3 players, but he wonders how new entrants ever manage to enter the market if they don't have their own portfolio of patents with which to (i) threaten infringement actions and (ii) offer to cross-license.


Andres Guadamuz said...

Campaign4Creativity said...

Jeremy, new entrants will try to negotiate a license and if that is refused will complain to the competition authorities. Alternatively they will innovate themselves and not need a license.

tweedledeetweedledum said...

This blog is awesome! If you get a chance you may want to visit this music software site, it's pretty awesome too!

Anonymous said...

free and easy internetjob for everybody in the world Google Marketing

Anonymous said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a download limp bizkit mp3 site/blog. It pretty much covers ##KEYWORD## related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

download limp bizkit mp3Mall

Brian said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a ad downtime hoc tracking site/blog. It pretty much covers ad downtime hoc tracking related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Anonymous said...

to all of the major RSS feed directories on the Internet.

Helping People Live Their Dreams said...

I read your blog about home based business.
Thanks. My blog isn't quite ready yet, but I
have a site about home based business.
I love to give information too so come on by
if you get some free time.

Anonymous said...

You have to try business economy site uk for FREE marketing and advertising. Keep up the interesting work in this blog.

Anonymous said...

For more useful informaiton visit our site about internet marketing consulting said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a multi level marketing site/blog. It pretty much covers multi level marketing related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':