The IPKat has been turning the pages of a most pleasurable new book from Sweet & Maxwell, Competition Litigation in the UK, edited by barristers Tim Ward and Kassie Smith (both from Monckton Chambers).
Descibed as a handbook (despite having xlix + 518 pages), this is a practitioner's guide to the current UK competition litigation regime. It is generally reckoned that competition litigation will increase dramatically under this European-law-influenced system and this work advises practitioners on every aspect of using it. In particular, says the publisher's blurb:
"it focuses on the role, the practice and procedure of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, and the growing body of case law emerging from it. As a complete guide to the subject it also steers readers through the substantive law and other key topics such as human rights, judicial review and competition law in arbitration".Usefully cross-referenced to the bible on the subject, Bellamy & Child's EC Law of Competition, this book has a strong contingent of contributors including Daniel Beard. Michael Bowsher, Julian Gregory, Anneli Howard, Josh Holmes, George Peretz, Meredith Pickford, Ben Rayment, Valentina Sloane and Christopher Vajda QC (all of Monckton Chambers), plus criminal barrister Clair Dobbin (3 Raymond Biuldings) and economist Paul Reynolds (Charles River Associates).
Another type of competition, one that attracts something other than litigation ...
Just in case anyone is wondering what a book on competition law is doing on an IP weblog, the IPKat reminds readers that IP and competition law are complementary legal doctrines. IP law creates monopolies, while competition law bats them down again. You have to know your enemy ...
At £95 it looks pretty good value for money. It's got a lot of how-to-do-it content as well as analytical content and is bound to be popular with its users.
COMPETITION LITIGATION IN THE UK
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Sunday, August 14, 2005
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html