Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / .eu DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES

.eu DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES


The IPKat is grateful to Cedric Manara for tipping him off that the .eu Dispute Resolution Rules have become available. EURid has appointed the Prague-based Czech Arbitration Court, which is attached to the Economic Chamber of the Czech Republic and Agricultural Chamber of the Czech Republic, as the body responsible for providing ADR for .eu disputes and the Czech Arbitration Court has now launched a public consultation on the rules that it has drafted.

The Arbitration Court is also seeking suitably qualified people to be panellists in .eu disputes.

The IPKat says that if you want to have your say, you’d better get your skates on – the consultation period ends 7 September.

.eu info here
.eu DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES .eu DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 03, 2005 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousWednesday, 3 August 2005 at 15:49:00 GMT+1

    With the greatest of respect to the Czech Arbitration Court, which I am sure is an excellent body, why on earth has it been chosen to arbitrate .eu domain names?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mobile OffersTuesday, 25 October 2005 at 23:56:00 GMT+1

    Market oi millions with blogblasterbusiness to business marketingbusiness to business marketing
    Please go to http://ww.blog-masters.net

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.