Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / NEW UK IP BLOG - THIS TIME A BARRISTER SPEAKS

NEW UK IP BLOG - THIS TIME A BARRISTER SPEAKS


August may be a quiet month for the rest of the world, but for legal bloggers in the UK it seems that it’s boom-time. On Tuesday the IPKat wrote about the first IP blog by a UK law firm. Well, now he has found the first IP blog by a UK barrister. John Lambert, head of chambers at Northern Intellectual Property Chambers, Huddersfield, writes NICPLAW. The blog so far has posts on patents, copyright, trade marks and competition law – and it only started on Monday!

John Lambert

The IPKat says good luck, John.
NEW UK IP BLOG - THIS TIME A BARRISTER SPEAKS NEW UK IP BLOG - THIS TIME A BARRISTER SPEAKS Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousFriday 4 November 2005 at 03:21:00 GMT

    "No Charge Online Advertising Channels For Any Business"

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.