MORE OF THE SAME ...


1 Wake up and smell the trade mark opposition

This from page 9 of the paper version of The Lawyer magazine for 8 August: London solicitors Edwin Coe are acting pro bono for the Ethiopian government in its attempt to prevent coffee giant Starbucks registering the words "Ethiopian coffee" as a trade mark.

The IPKat wonders if there's something missing from this tale. Coffee is grown in Ethiopia and has been almost since the dawn of humanity. If "Ethiopian coffee" is used for coffee from Ethiopia, it's unregistrable as a trade mark because it's totally descriptive; if it's used for coffee from anywhere else, it's unregistrable because it's deceptive. Unless ... Starbucks are cunningly seeking to register "Ethiopian coffee" for something quite unrelated to coffee, such as rubber gloves or dry cleaning services.

More on Ethiopian coffee here
Ethiopian coffee ceremony here
The original Starbuck here
The history of Starbucks here
Starbucks gossip here


2 Patinnova 2005

The European Patent Office has just announced details of this year's Patinnova 2005 conference, to be held from 8 to 10 November in Budapest.

Having spoken at the previous Patinnova (2003, Luxembourg) on IP litigation strategy in Europe, IPKat co-blogmeister Jeremy can recommend this event because the participants and those who attend are drawn from a wide cross-section of the innovation community: you actually get a chance to discover how the strengths and weaknesses of the patent system are viewed by people and small/medium-sized businesses as well as by the big battalions.


3 Volunteers needed
Readers of this blog will know that Oxford University Press is shortly to launch a new monthly periodical, the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, which Jeremy is editing. Articles in JIPLP are refereed, to ensure at least a modicum of objective quality control. This is where help is needed. Jeremy keeps asking the same few people to do the refereeing, but he really needs to widen the group of people to whom he can turn for comments as to the quality or publishability of articles submitted.

If you would like to be considered for the task of reading the occasional draft article and commenting on it, please email Jeremy here and let him know the area(s) of IP in which you profess expertise.
MORE OF THE SAME ... MORE OF THE SAME ... Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, August 08, 2005 Rating: 5

3 comments:

  1. Consider the power of being able to create incoming links to your site any time you want them...

    ReplyDelete
  2. And A Link Back To Your Web Site Excite You?

    ReplyDelete
  3. putting to waste some good money that could have been used in other areas of development for the business involved.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.