For the half-year to 30 June 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Alberto Bellan, Darren Meale and Nadia Zegze.

Two of our regular Kats are currently on blogging sabbaticals. They are David Brophy and Catherine Lee.

Thursday, 18 August 2005

REFERRED QUESTION IN ANIMAL v OAKLEY

The UK Patent Office confirms that a reference has been made to the ECJ in the Oakley v Animal design case (here and here). The reference concerns the question of whether Member States can rely on derogations in directives when they are implementing those directives out of time and the referred question is available here.



The IPKat awaits the ECJ’s decision with baited breath and waxed whiskers.

3 comments:

Jeremy said...

Not wishing to be a pedant, I think you'll find it's "bated breath": see the discussion at http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-bai1.htm

Ilanah said...

Yeah, right. Of course you wish to be a pedant!

Jeremy said...

No, in point of fact. Some are born pedants, others achieve pedantry ... but there are also people called co-bloggers, who have pedantry thrust upon them.

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':