BUN FIGHT HEADS FOR MELTDOWN; PATENT COOPERATION TIME

Bun fight heads for meltdown

The IPKat has learned from the BBC, via his friend Simon Haslam, of a vicious Austrian dispute over Easter Bunnies. Chocolatier Lindt claims the exclusive right to make a golden Easter bunny with a red ribbon around its neck, selling some 60 million of them each year. Austrian company Hauswirth has apparently been making similar bunnies for half a century. The news report does not make it clear what sort of IP right Lindt holds, but it the IPKat presumes that it's a trade mark registration for a three-dimensional product, consisting of the chocobunny itself.

Above right: the Lindt bunny (the Hauswirth bunny was not available for comment). Below left: a generic chocolate rabbit.

Litigation was inevitable after Hauswirth rejected Lindt's lawyers suggestion that Hauswirth adopt bronze wrapping instead of gold and a green ribbon instead of red. Lindt obtained interim injunctive relief and a further hearing has been scheduled for June.

Make your own chocolate rabbit here
Why your own rabbit should be made of chocolate here


Patent cooperation time

WIPO has informed the IPKat of two new Patent Cooperation Treaty members: the Lao People's Democratic Republic (as of 14 June 2006) and the Republic of Honduras six days later on 20 June 2006.

With these two additions, PCT membership will stand at 130. Can you name them all without looking? Click here to see if you're right.

Merpel says, here's another question for you. Lao is a 'Democratic Republic' while Honduras is just a 'Republic'. Which one is the democracy? Click here for some strong criticism of democracy Laotian-style.
BUN FIGHT HEADS FOR MELTDOWN; PATENT COOPERATION TIME BUN FIGHT HEADS FOR MELTDOWN; PATENT COOPERATION TIME Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.