Epidos News rebranded

The European Patent Office news letter Epidos News (right) has metamorphosed into the somewhat descriptive Patent Information News. This slender publication must have taken the EPO by surprise: the IPKat keyed the new title into the little search box on the EPO's website and got a zero response.

Below, left: Measuring European Patent Office employees up for a chair they'll never forget

Incidentally, the EPO is trading in swivel chairs. It's buying 400 new swivel chairs for its Infrastructure Department in Rijswijk, the Netherlands, plus another 250 directors' leather chairs for its Munich HQ. Asks the IPKat, does the EPO have so many directors? And Merpel enquires, why swivel chairs - do they possess any functional efficiency?

A little bit quiet

Keeping one eye open for the activities of his fellow bloggers, the IPKat notes that some of the sites he likes to visit have gone a bit quiet in recent weeks. In particular
* The Shape Blog has not posted since 1 March 2006;

* LASP (Lawyers Against Software Patents) - last recorded post 6 March 2006;

* Strange Brands has been silent since 10 December 2005;

* bIPlog, the Berkeley Intellectual Property weblog, last posted on 30January 2006.
Can anyone tell the IPKat if these weblogs have relocated or ceased to function - or are their writers merely pausing for thought before launching into action again?
GOODBYE EPIDOS; A LITTLE BIT QUIET GOODBYE EPIDOS; A LITTLE BIT QUIET Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, April 10, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.