Morcom no go

Earlier this week the IPKat announced that Christopher Morcom QC was stepping down as Head of Hogarth Chambers. Chris has asked him to clarify that, while he may be relinquishing the reins, he is emphatically not retiring from practice. So good luck Chris - and we'll see you in court!

Shop right and the Net

Co-blogmeister Jeremy, wearing his JIPLP hat, needs some help. He recalls that, in the United States, a case-law doctrine called the 'shop right' was developed. This doctrine stated (and here Jeremy is writing from memory) that, where an employee made a patented invention that belonged to him since the employment contract didn't require him to assign it to his employer, the employer still had an irrevocable, free but non-exclusive right to use it at the place of work where it was created.

Jeremy has three questions:
* is the shop right still part of US patent/employment law?

* how does it work where the invention is an internet-related one?

* is there a kind volunteer out there, most probably from the United States, who could write an article for JIPLP on the current status of the shop right?
Answers, please, to Jeremy here.

More on the shop right here , here and here
MORCOM NO GO; SHOP RIGHT AND THE NET MORCOM NO GO; SHOP RIGHT AND THE NET Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, April 05, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.