Cliff Richard is figureheading a campaign to increase the length of performers’ rights for singers and musicians says the BBC. Currently performers’ rights last for 50 years from the end of the year in which the performance was performed, compared with 70 years post mortem for the composers of musical works and the writers of lyrics.He told Radio 4’s Today programme:
"It seems to me we should ask for parity…It doesn't seem just…It seems terribly wrong that 50 years on they lose everything from it".
He also pointed out that many 1950s singers rely on their copyright royalties as a pension.

The IPKat isn’t particularly convinced by this. Parity isn’t a feature of the copyright regime. Different types of works are accorded different lengths and levels of protection based on how ‘deserving’ they are felt to be. Lack of parity isn’t limited to performers’ rights and any attempt to ‘level up’ should in theory have a knock-on effect across the copyright board. He also wonders how many other professions there are in which workers can expect to get new money from the work that they did fifty years ago. Other workers are expected to use their earnings as they work to plan for the future.
Thanks to Russell Woolford of Shoosmiths for pointing out this story.
NO LONGER THE YOUNG ONES NO LONGER THE YOUNG ONES Reviewed by Anonymous on Friday, April 21, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.