For the half-year to 31 December 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Rebecca Gulbul, Lucas Michels and Marie-Andrée Weiss.

Regular round-ups of the previous week's blogposts are kindly compiled by Alberto Bellan.

Wednesday, 16 January 2008

Scrabble scramble


New.com.au reports that Hasbro and Mattel are trying to shut down Scrabulous, an online version of their Scrabble game, which is available through Facebook. There is currently no authorised electronic version of Scrabble, but Electronic Arts is developing one under licence.

The IPKat says that infringing other people’s IP rights is never a good idea, and the fact that you’re doing it online doesn’t magically make it OK. In the ideal world of pragamtic utopia, Hasbro would make both itself and its fans happy and take over the existing version, though that wouldn’t be possible on the assumption that Hasbro has granted Electronic Arts an exclusive licence.

7 comments:

cath said...

Interesting post. Surely there must be a way through there though - by getting the scrabulous developers on board to work with EA, or just buying their code outright and giving it EA to play with?

I also blogged about the situation here if you're interested:

http://electricelephant.com/blog/?p=41

Anonymous said...

I used to play an official software version of scrabble and my grandmother still plays scrabble on a playstation. So there must have been an official release.

What would happen if they just released the game without referring to "scrabble" (or in this case "scrab") - maybe call it something like "makeaword - not endorsed by or related to Scrabble". Presumably the game isn't patented (in Europe at least) and using that wording should therefore head off any TM/PO issues?

Anonymous said...

I'm guessing there would be copyright in the board layout, so TMs aren't the only issue.

Ilanah said...

I think the article must be been inaccurate. It must have meant online .

To be fair, much as I would like Hasbro to bring the developers on board, the risk would be that it would encourage future 'entrepreneurs' to make unauthorised developments in the hope of being bought out for large amounts of money.

FOARP said...

This is going to be the first in a long line of such cases, as cloned versions of Risk, Monopoly and a lot of other classic board games are also up on Facebook.

Owais H. Shaikh said...

copyrights are also involved where rules of the game are concerned...

Anonymous said...

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt that the copyright in the rules will be an issue.

All of these games are so well known that people don't need to be told the rules in order to play. So no re-printing/production of the rules is necessary, so no potential infringement there.

In the absence of rule reproduction, I didn't think playing a game according to copyrighted rules was an infringement of that copyright.

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':