RIAA-guard action, or failed business model?

The IPKat thanks his vigilant and copyright-sensitive friend Ben Challis (of Music Law Updates fame) for sending him this Washington Post item, "Download Uproar: Record Industry Goes After Personal Use". The piece mentions that the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has commenced court proceedings against one Jeffrey Howell, a Scottsdale, Arizona, who kept a collection of about 2,000 music recordings on his personal computer.

Right: If I change the spelling of my surname from Howl to Howell, does that really make me a copy-cat?

RIAA says this is serious infringing activity; Jowell says it's okay, since he legally purchased CDs in order to transfer the music into his computer. Says the article:

"The RIAA's legal crusade against its customers is a classic example of an old media company clinging to a business model that has collapsed".
The RIAA disagrees:

"The industry 'will continue to bring lawsuits' against those who 'ignore years of warnings', RIAA spokesman Jonathan Lamy said in a statement. 'It's not our first choice, but it's a necessary part of the equation. There are consequences for breaking the law'. And, perhaps, for firing up your computer".

The IPKat can see both sides of the story, but he has this to say: it's very easy to describe the sale of CDs as a failed business model, but one may just as easily say that the sale of legitimate branded goods is also a failed business model for much the same reason.

Perhaps what the RIAA is trying to protect is not so much a failed business model as a business model that must now compete with other legitimate business models, as well as unauthorised and unlawful ones, in a manner that was not foreseen when the original business plan was shaped in the light of the law as it was then accepted. Merpel says, can I buy Mr Howell's computer when he's finished with it ... please?

Left: the IPKat remembers the old days, when a computer the size of a room could just about store "Happy Birthday to You" and the first thee verses of "Ten Green Bottles".
RIAA-guard action, or failed business model? RIAA-guard action, or failed business model? Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, January 02, 2008 Rating: 5


  1. Bill Patry blogged this (with another paper's story on the same subject) and added his own comments which I found interesting. http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2007/12/establishment-press-takes-riaa-on.html

  2. See Mr. Patry's comments on what the brief ACTUALLY says -- it's towards the bottom.



All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.