RIAA sues dowload defence lawyer

The IPKat has learnt from Computer World that RIAA (the Recording Industry Association of America) has brought legal proceedings against Ray Beckerman, a New York based lawyer who had defended a number of individuals who have been at the receiving end of RIAA downloading lawsuits.
Ray Beckerman (left)
It appears that the claims against Mr Beckerman are part of a motion to dismiss a case, brought by RIAA, against a lady who claims not to know how to operate a computer. RIAA is arguing that its ability to uncover evidence was impaired by Beckerman and his client and that various ‘frivolous’ motions were filed.

RIAA has also objected to the fact that Mr Beckerman posts details on cases on his blog, ‘Recording Industry vs The People’, arguing that this ‘demeans the integrity of these judicial proceedings and warrants this imposition of sanctions’.

The IPKat doesn’t like the sound of this too much. He is particularly disturbed by the idea that an attorney shouldn’t be able to publicise details of his cases – what about free speech? After all, RIAA tends to be vocal about the lawsuits it is bringing in order for those actions to have the deterrent effect that it desires.
RIAA sues dowload defence lawyer RIAA sues dowload defence lawyer Reviewed by Unknown on Monday, September 22, 2008 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. It is unfortunate that the RIAA's heavy handed tactics against its customers and now one of their attorneys reinforce customers' negative views of the music industry, which in turn fosters further illegal up- and downloading of music.

    Music companies have been good at marketing music, but they have not been good at developing new talent or, with the exception of a few stars, paying them. The Internet and the digitization of music has made their business model no longer sustainable. These law suits most resemble Custer's Last Stand.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.