The IPKat was interested to read in the Daily Telegraph that the governing is considering calls from the cancer charity, Cancer Research UK, for cigarettes to only be sold in plain black and white packaging, without branding. This follows research which has found that the likelihood of a child taking up smoking increases by 35% for each cigarette brand that he knows.
According to Professor Gerard Hastings, director of social marketing at the University of Stirling, who led the research:
'We know that the younger you are when you start smoking the harder it is to quit...Our research shows that the point of sale displays allow tobacco companies to package and market cigarettes with powerful brand imagery to entice new smokers. This turns the pack, or 'silent salesman', into a small advertisement and the wall of cigarettes into a big one'.
The IPKat is no fan of smoking, and would back any move which prevents young people from takng up the habit. As a trade mark lawyer, he finds the proposal intriguing. This would be as close to an undifferentiated market for goods provided by multiple suppliers as we're likely to get - will the market collapse, as economists seem to predict in such situations, or which it remain vibrant thanks to the images built up by previous advertising and mythology surrounding the different brands?
Proposal to remove branding from cigarettes
![Proposal to remove branding from cigarettes]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Friday, September 05, 2008
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Thou shalt not discriminate the Lego block over any other kind of product – GRUR speaks out on C-211/24](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWJYQUJNvYydrZcjwSHPuxd14xX3_48aBusHKBogY-Wg1BPSJSABbFFjmGiUV3aqG2npP9xYaIl1vtWK5AsqGOQPgRD2TWFLhyyc4xGm1fHDD-tt9kHcrSSgAyju2P9wSKz0VW6h7D5MD4Hxd9vREyxKYzlMRNXxxtxc3DiNsXppfVaxgSxAMV/s72-c/21742619125_7c9e53cd39_o.png)
![[Guest post] Comparison of wine and gin: the EUIPO’s unquestionable Similarity Tool](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNfTEBXiPVS0XjZi4mNE1OtXLxXiEp1PUgcUK7MMMXlfyTkO5SMXv-VCMXXNdS_F1XdMMxYca1VbBTGvvDeTVpo5x-5YwR7atQJmK3x32T8LACpf4308kht3nEtaxPwEPcGGrB0s5xjGktmQPOiVwPVLRO5JbW19qupc7xUtiVutvaWHow0OpBkA/s72-c/Picture%201.jpg)
![[Guest post] Muddying the waters of copyright – a rapid reaction to today’s IPEC decision which sees the sinking of the WaterRower’s claims for copyright protection](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7chFANC7ppmZl4_nlR6_hZEcg6cOhVEJNVXqki4p82BoVlcLFotuOXzHWYD5lKLiiK_kRoWeXmJjjaV2DpoKsAWq8U3LFioO5W_841a9gcfDIFjvZWcGqfnr0jWJNtyXptIYR_8bxCssaDkJ9KMokuSqy1g65Il7p2hPwo4MfRCEGoUPQJesvbg/s72-w400-c-h189/Screenshot%202024-11-11%20at%2018.20.45.png)
Posts
I'm not quite sure how to make sense of "It comes as researchers have found that the likelihood of a child taking up smoking increases by 35 per cent for every tobacco brand they know." Surely a child who knows 3 brands is not 105% likely to take up smoking?
ReplyDeleteWhat a very odd statistic.
"It is a well known fact that cigarettes are the world's leading cause of statistics" (Anon)
ReplyDelete"There are three kinds of lies, lies, damned lies and statistics" (Benjamin Disraeli)
I can't claim to be a statistician, but I suspect that it works like this. It's only the risk that increases by 35%. So let's say the of all children taking up smoking its 10%. If a child knows one extra brand, this risk will increase to 13.5% (10% plus 35% of 10%) etc.
ReplyDeleteI think that the market will continue quite nicely (nicely not being an appropriate word, I know), given the addictive nature of the product.
ReplyDelete