The Law and the Profits: 10 commandments for IP finance?

Writing in the October 2008 issue of the WIPO Magazine, IPKat team member Jeremy has tried to enumerate some of the key issues that IP owners -- and those involved in IP transactions -- have to bear in mind when finance issues arise. His short article "IP Financing -- The Ten Commandments" has a stab at listing the five most important "dos" and the five correspondingly significant "don'ts" for IP owners. These are listed below. Readers of this blog are invited to post their comments below, preferably with reasons attached ....
Thou shalt …

1. Identify your IP clearly. Inventors make inventions. Designers create designs. But it’s the lawyers who create IP rights when they examine a newly-created concept and proclaim it to be comprised of various different intellectual properties. Thus an inventor may come up with a new torch, but to a legal specialist there’s a patent for the functionality, a design for the shape, a possible trademark again for the shape, and so on. If you are pledging IP to a lender or licensing it to a manufacturer, be sure to know what exactly it is that you are dealing with.

2. Read the small print in finance documents. Not just banks but all commercial lenders are sensitive about their money. They are as excited about their money, which is their principal asset, as the IP innovator is excited by his new creation. This is why they include terms in a contract for the financing of IP development that are for their own protection. So read the details of the contract and, if need be, have them explained to you. If consumers refuse to buy the exciting new widget for which a bank has advanced cash on the security of some patents, and the borrower defaults, does the bank just get to keep the patents, or can it collect on your work-tools, your car or anything else?

3. Keep proper records. Particularly if you have received public funding – or if you are called to account for not having used investment cash for the purposes for which it was lent. Proper records may be a pain to prepare but they can protect you from untold annoyance and embarrassment later.

4. Recognize your limitations. The modern creator rarely has all the plant, equipment, know-how and management skills to take a project from drawing board (or computer screen) to marketplace. Don’t spend time and money learning what you can buy from or outsource to others, unless it makes business sense to do so.

5. Make contingency plans. Even the best plans can go wrong; this is certainly the case with business plans for innovative products and services. By definition, no one has ever done what the IP owner hopes to do, so the past gives few clues as to how the future will turn out. That’s why it’s wise to have a Plan B. Keep asking “what if …?” questions and see what answers emerge. If there is no realistic Plan B, ask if it’s worth taking the financial risk of developing the IP in the first place.

Thou shalt not …

6. Don't be greedy. Most IP rights generate little or no profit on their own, but they can prove valuable when combined with the products or services of others. A chef’s new pizza recipe will earn him more if he licenses its use to a chain of franchised outlets –even if the chain makes more from each pizza than he does – than if he opens his own pizzeria and spends his days policing competitors in case they copy his delicious product.

7. Don’t overlook other people’s IP rights. The value of an IP right might be entirely contingent on receiving permission from other IP owners to use their IP. For example, a patented lubricant that cannot be made without infringing a patent for the original version of it. Payments to other IP owners can be substantial – and their existence must always be disclosed to potential lenders on security, since they will sue the borrower if a secured IP turns out to be unusable in this way.

8. Don’t forget the dynamics of the marketplace. It is easy to view the commercialization of an innovation as being literally the ‘last word’, the dawn of a halcyon era in which a new product is manufactured, distributed, purchased and profitably marketed until the end of time. This rarely happens. Competitors rise to the challenge of innovating around any successful new product in order to share, or improve upon, its money-earning ability (who still uses portable cassette players?); fashions and tastes change (how much revenue would a new Bing Crosby song generate in 2008?); even the environment takes its toll, as dazzling new contrivances are rejected for their carbon footprint. The moral is clear: when computing how many years of income you may enjoy, during which you hope to pay off a loan or redeem a mortgaged IP right, be realistic: you may have far less time than you think.

9. Don’t overlook the effect of ‘leakage’. Copyright in works such as sound recordings can be difficult to police and enforce in a world inhabited by private copying devices, even though those works are hugely profitable at launch. If IP rights cannot plug infringement leakage, works may remain hugely popular, but the stream of income from them may diminish to a trickle.

10. Don't borrow more than you need. Public funding usually doesn’t have to be paid back, but the private sector does – and the lender gets his profit by charging interest or its equivalent. This means that, over the period of the loan, you may have to repay far more than you borrowed. To reduce the risk of doing this, (i) only borrow as much as your budget suggests you need, and (ii) don’t borrow it until you really need it, or you’ll be paying interest on the loan before you’ve been able to put it to use".
The Law and the Profits: 10 commandments for IP finance? The Law and the Profits: 10 commandments for IP finance? Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, September 26, 2008 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.