Changes to Chinese patent law in the offing

China Daily reports that amendments to the Chinese Patent Law have been speeded up following the adoption of the Chinese National Intellectual Property Strategy. Amendments include:

  1. 1. the introduction of an absolute novelty standard – inventions will need to be novel worldwide, and not just in China;
  2. 2. streamlining the patent application process to encourage more Chinese inventors to apply for patents;
  3. 3. removing the requirement that Chinese legal and natural persons must first apply for patents in China before making foreign applications;
  4. a compulsory licensing scheme where a patent has not been sufficiently exploited within three years of grant, or has been abused by the grantee
  5. changes to the damages regime.

The amendments have been submitted to the National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee for a first reading, but would require two further readings to be passed.

The IPKat welcomes the changes, which appear to put China more in step with the international position, while at the same time addressing Chinese social concerns.

Changes to Chinese patent law in the offing Changes to Chinese patent law in the offing Reviewed by Unknown on Monday, September 08, 2008 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Just to clear up any confusion here, I think China currently has relative novelty - so inventions need to have novelty over worldwide publications at present, but only local use.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.