in its day, but is it
adequate for 2011?
"Our new logo is protected under Article 6ter of the Paris Convention. Our basic principles are that our logo should be used primarily for WIPO activities, and we do not authorize the use of our logo by third party for publications, web sites, events, etc. ..."The IPKat remains concerned. Article 6ter requires the countries of the Paris Union to protect the sign. This does not mean that WIPO can take the initiative. Does WIPO have locus standi to litigate its logos in national courts, or does it have to present its compliments to the Czech government and ask them if they would be so kind as to eradicate this pest? Merpel says, given the similarity between the two websites, one might feel that there is an argument in favour of copyright infringement -- but the Paris Union doesn't really cover copyright, does it?
this item on the Court of Justice of the European Union reference for a preliminary ruling in the WEBSHIPPING trade mark dispute, Case C-235/09 DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA. This is an incredibly interesting case, which actually goes to the very heart of European trade mark law. Alas, the Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón is available in a wide selection of official European languages -- but not English. The Kat has been asked, by a reader who is even more frustrated than he is, if he knows of any translation -- authentic or otherwise -- which is available for consultation. If you can put your finger on such a wonderful thing, please let the Kats know!
|If you want to know what's going|
round, get the information straight
from the horse's mouth
Over the Winter break quite a few blogs with which the IPKat and his friends are associated have had some happy news to celebrate. The MARQUES Class 46 weblog (in which three members of the IPKat team participate), which focuses on European trade mark and branding issues, has now welcomed its 1,700th email subscriber. The unrelated Class 99 blog on design law and practice has passed the 400 subscriber mark, as has the weblog associated with JIPLP (the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice), the jiplp weblog. Patent litigation weblog PatLit has just touched the 700 subscriber mark, but is still trialling the copyright-based 1709 Blog which -- for those readers who like their round numbers a little less round -- now has 750 subscribers.
|Networking via the INTA?|
This is the sign to watch out for
Jeannette Thinus with your CV by not later than 28 January 2011.
Perhaps it was because everyone was on holiday, but on 24 December the IPKat received no responses to the post in which he mentioned that he had recently been in correspondence with a young and charming Polish lawyer with interests in intellectual property, new media and IT law -- and a CV to kill for. The Kat added: "The young man in question does not intend to practise as a barrister in England and Wales but he is seeking an unfunded pupillage there in order to enrich his experience, following which he will return to the post that is being held for him by the Polish affiliate of a large, successful company in the telecoms sector. If you can offer him an unfunded pupillage for six months from October 2011, he -- and the IPKat -- will be delighted. If you'd like to know more, please email the IPKat here and let him know; he'll forward your email". So, if you're back from your holiday and want to avail yourself of the chance to meet a very special individual, let's hear from you!