For the half-year to 30 June 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Alberto Bellan, Darren Meale and Nadia Zegze.

Two of our regular Kats are currently on blogging sabbaticals. They are David Brophy and Catherine Lee.

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

Polar bear KNUT - the saga continues!

Two years after his sad and untimely death, German celebrity polar bear Knut (right) is again in the news and -- still (!) -- in the centre of a trade mark dispute.  Our readers will recall Knut's rise to global fame and the various trade mark issues surrounding the marketing of Knut and other high profile (polar) bears. Two weeks ago German media reported (here and here) that a sculpture of KNUT, covered in his own skin and with a damp nose (?!), had gone on display in Berlin. But that is not all – the legal disputes surrounding KNUT trade marks also continue.

The General Court of the European Union is today concerned with Knut-related dispute Case T=250/10 KNUT IP Management v OHIM — Zoologischer Garten Berlin (KNUT — DER EISBÄR; in English: KNUT – the polar bear). The court has been asked by KNUT IP Management Ltd to annul the decision of OHIM's First Board of Appeal of the Office of 17 March 2010 in Case R 650/2009-1

By way of background: Zoologischer Garten Berlin AG had – initially only partly successfully, and on appeal to the Board of Appeal, fully successfully - opposed a Community trade mark application for ‘KNUT — DER  EISBÄR’ in the name of KNUT IP Management Ltd and for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 25, 28 and 41.  Zoologischer Garten Berlin AG had based its opposition on the following KNUT trade mark portfolio: the German word mark ‘KNUD’ (sic) for  goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 28; German word mark ‘Knut — der Eisbär’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28 and 41; German word mark ‘KNUT’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35, 39, 41, 42 and 43; German word mark ‘KNUT’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 18, 21, 25, 28, 35, 41 and 42. 

KNUT IP Management Ltd contends an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009, because in itsview there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks.  In a nutshell: the whole dispute hinges on a detailed comparison of the goods and services and on how the element “DER EISBÄR” affects the similarity of marks. 

To be continued..... no doubt since we live in interesting times where even a 'dead celebrity zoo animal' can still be worth millions.

Polar bear recipe here
Eisbär here
Isobar here

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

leave the poor animal alone. enough already!

Anonymous said...

I loved Knut. Know you will be always loved and thought of. Missing you kind bear.

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':