Two years after his sad and untimely death,
German celebrity polar bear Knut (right) is again in the news and -- still (!) -- in the centre of a trade mark
dispute. Our readers will recall Knut's
rise to global fame and the various trade mark issues surrounding the marketing
of Knut and other high profile (polar) bears. Two weeks ago German media reported (
here and
here) that a
sculpture of KNUT, covered in his own skin and with a damp nose (?!), had gone on
display in Berlin. But that is not all – the legal disputes surrounding KNUT
trade marks also continue.
The General
Court of the European Union is today concerned with Knut-related dispute
Case T=250/10 KNUT IP Management v OHIM —
Zoologischer Garten Berlin (KNUT — DER EISBÄR; in English: KNUT – the polar
bear). The court has
been asked by KNUT IP Management Ltd to
annul the decision of OHIM's First Board of Appeal of the Office of 17 March 2010
in
Case R 650/2009-1.
By way of background: Zoologischer Garten Berlin AG had – initially
only partly successfully, and on appeal to the Board of Appeal, fully successfully - opposed
a Community trade mark application for ‘KNUT — DER EISBÄR’ in the name of KNUT IP Management
Ltd and for goods and services in
Classes 9, 16, 25, 28 and 41.
Zoologischer Garten Berlin AG had based its opposition on the following
KNUT trade mark portfolio: the German word mark ‘KNUD’ (sic) for goods
and services in Classes 9, 16 and 28; German word mark ‘Knut — der Eisbär’ for
goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28 and 41; German word mark ‘KNUT’ for
goods and services in Classes 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24,
25, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35, 39, 41, 42 and 43; German word mark ‘KNUT’ for
goods and services in Classes 16, 18, 21, 25, 28, 35, 41 and 42.
KNUT IP Management Ltd contends an infringement of Article
8(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009, because in itsview there is no likelihood of confusion
between the marks. In a nutshell: the
whole dispute hinges on a detailed comparison of the goods and services and on
how the element “DER EISBÄR” affects the similarity of marks.
To be continued..... no doubt since we live in interesting times where even a 'dead celebrity zoo animal' can still be
worth millions.
Polar bear recipe
here
Eisbär
here
Isobar
here
leave the poor animal alone. enough already!
ReplyDeleteI loved Knut. Know you will be always loved and thought of. Missing you kind bear.
ReplyDelete