Meet and greet the 206th edition of Never Too Late! *Joint post by Cecilia Sbrolli & Ieva Giedrimaite*
Book Reviews
Weekly roundups: Wednesday
Whimsies.
Image credits: socialmediasl444.
Copyright
Definitely no copyright in taste |
Do you smell copyright protection? You must be wrong, because
in BREAKING:
CJEU says NO to copyright in the taste of a cheese and in The
Levola Hengelo CJEU decision: ambiguities, uncertainties ... and more questions, Kat Eleonora reports
on the reasoning behind the CJEU decision in case C-310/17 Levola Hengelo, notably the first
time that the Court has tackled the notion
of 'work' under the InfoSoc Directive.
In Enforcing
copyright in government documents? Not as uncommon as one might think, The IPKat hosted the alert, as provided by
Katfriend Mathias Schindler, concerning a case where copyright was used by the German government
to prevent or at least stall the dissemination of documents into the public
sphere and the public domain status of certain official works was
deemed not to apply.
In his post Linda
Nochlin, "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists"? Relevant as
ever, controversial as ever, Kat Neil discusses
Nochlin's seminal feminist 1971 essay on why there are no "great women
artists", this in light of the recent publication of the book "Ninth
Street Woman”, which focusses on the challenges of five aspiring female artists
in New York after World War II.
GuestKat
Mathilde yet again contemplates the
burden of a re-sale right royalty. In a dispute between Christie’s France and
Syndicat National des Antiquaires, the French Supreme Court has ruled that the
re-sale right royalty is owed by the buyer and not the seller, which has
overturned the position in place since 1920. Buyers
beware! …You may owe re-sale right royalties
Patents
BREAKING
NEWS: Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Warner-Lambert's painful Lyrica
appeal InternKat Rose gives
her first (actually in depth) impressions on the much-awaited patent decision.
Rose writes that, in short, the Court dismissed
Warner-Lambert's appeal that the patent was sufficiently disclosed, and upheld
Actavis and Mylan's appeal that the disputed claims were not even partially
sufficient. The Supreme Court also unanimously held that, if the claims had
been found valid, they would not have infringed. The Supreme Court was
also unanimous on construction and found that the post-trial amendment sought
by Warner-Lambert was an abuse of process.
Trade Marks
Inspired by an ordinary case
of urban strolling, where he was mistaken for a local bus driver due to the
colour of his shirt, Kat Neil discusses the role played by colour. Can it attract a trade mark monopoly? What
distinctive characteristics and associations does it evoke? Does centrality of
place and circumstance matter? All answers here: Why
is this Kat laughing (hint: it's all about his blue shirt)?
Event Reports
GuestKat Eibhlin has been purring about conferences and shared two
event reports with us this week: one on the AIPPI Rapid Response
event on the Unwired Planet decision and the other on
the ChIPs event, "Take your seat at the Bench".
During the AIPPI
Rapid Response event - Unwired Planet (Court of Appeal decision), the details of the decision were discussed as well as the
position of UK, German and Chinese courts vis à vis SEP cases.
Other topics discussed included licence to all; dominance; and delay due to
service.
In Take
your seat at the Bench: an evening with the IP/tech judges, Eibhlin reported on the event organised by the ChIPs London
Chapter, whereby many questions were addressed to the panel of women judges
concerning, inter alia, the job, the proceedings, and the judicial process.
Labelling
The
IPKat offers a contribution by Mina Kianfar (Unverzagt
von Have, Hamburg) on an issue of energy labelling obligations. Vacuum cleaner
producer Dyson has successfully challenged an EU non-legislative act: in its
judgment of 8.11.2018, T-544/13, the General Court has annulled Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 on the energy labelling of vacuum
cleaners. Mina’s analysis is available here: General
Court annuls Delegated Regulation 665/2013 on energy labelling of vacuum
cleaners.
In her Book
review: Artist, Authorship & Legacy: A Reader by Daniel McClean, GuestKat Mathilde describes
the essence of this book as follows: The ambiguity of copyright’s relationship with art, or art with
copyright, is precisely what this book is about. McClean brings together
twenty-two essays by different authors, who collectively examine both the
overlaps and gaps between legal and artistic authorship,
this against the backdrop of the day-to-day practice of commissioning, buying,
exhibiting and curating artworks.
GuestKat Rosie reviews a new published book, Cross-Border Copyright Licensing: Law and
Practice, edited by Carlo Scollo
Lavizzari and Rene Viljoen, which aims to guide its readers through copyright,
licensing, contract and competition law issues,
plus cross border complexities, particularly
as they relate to China, the EU, India, Mexico, Russia, Singapore, South Africa
and the US. Book review: Cross-Border Copyright Licensing: Law and Practice.
Image credits: socialmediasl444.
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE
Never
Too Late 205 [Weeks ending 4 and 11
Nov] Chinese Supreme Court: hoarding trade marks in bad
faith falls within scope of “illegitimate means” | 3-second cinematic sequence
sufficiently distinctive to be a trade mark, says EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal |
'Winter Is Coming' vs 'Sanctions Are Coming': a 'trademark misuse' also in
languages other than Dothraki? | Auctioning Art(ificial Intelligence): The IP
implications of Edmond de Belamy | Report from 2018Annual Meeting of the
European Policy for Intellectual Property Association | The drumbeat gets
louder: is anti-competitive conduct trumping innovation as the foundation for
high tech dominance? | Criminal conviction over disparaging religious doctrines
not a violation of freedom of expression: potential IP implications of the
latest ECtHR ruling | Event Report: Trade Mark Conference 2018 | What can be
the main events in the life of a copyright work in Europe? Here's another map |
Complicating designs: whither the EU reforms, and what impact will Brexit have?
| Book Review: Kerly’s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names | Thursday Thingies |
Around the IP Blogs
Never Too Late 204 [Week ending 28 Oct] Court of
Appeal reaffirms UK as SEP litigation hotspot in upholding Birss J in Unwired
Planet | Much Ado About FRAND: What you need to know about today's Court of
Appeal Unwired Planet decision | AIPPI UK Rapid Response Event: Unwired Planet
v Huawei - 13 November at 6PM | Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly
different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v
Ice-World | AG Szpunar advises CJEU to rule that copyright cannot subsist in
military report in important fundamental rights case | Australia considers
reform of its website blocking regime, including possibility to target search
engines and new types of injunctions | Swedish Court orders ISP to block access
to The Pirate Bay and other Torrent sites | What's your party drink? - Asolo v
Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges
Never Too Late 203 [Weeks ending 14
and 21 Oct] Does FEYONCÉ blur BEYONCÉ's distinctiveness? | Why
pay more? What "opaque hotel inventory" teaches us about brands and
search costs. | Swatch versus Apple: If you "Tick different" does
that mean that you "THINK DIFFERENT"? | Argos goes to the Court of
Appeal but leaves empty handed | Retromark Volume IV: the last six months in
trade marks | World Food Day! Patentable foods: The "Impossible" and
the eggless | Advertisement distributed by Swedish ISP held to be sexually
discriminatory | Italian Supreme Court holds that an unauthorized derivative
work may be both infringing and protectable | CJEU weighs on liability of owner
of internet connection used to infringe copyright | GCC diplomaticcrisis
update: Qatar’s new request for consultation with Saudi to address IPviolations
| Brexit and Brands Part 4 | Blockchain and intellectual property - where are
we now and what does the future have in store? | Special interview with Mariana
Karepova, the President of the Austrian Patent Office | ChIPs Global Summit
Report 1: Politics and Technology - When D.C. met Silicon Valley | Book review:
Kritika - Essays on Intellectual Property (vol 3) | Tuesday Tiddlywinks
Never Too Late 202 [Week ending 7 October] Looking to discuss
the latest developments in competition law in the pharma sector? Here’s an
event for you | Public procurement of pharmaceuticals and the patent system,
the first date of a stormy relationship? | What may be the main (potential)
events in the life of an EU/national trade mark? Here's a new map | Event:
Computer-Implemented Inventions - Monday 8 Oct 2018 | Can warehouse storage of
copyright-infringing products be considered an act of distribution? AG Campos
advises CJEU to rule 'yes' | Copyright monetisation: does technology help or
hinder? IPWeek @ SG 2018 | Around the IP Blogs! | Friday Fantasies
Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Cecilia Sbrolli
on
Tuesday, December 11, 2018
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html