3 comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
Are the separate rankings for "copyright" blogs and "intellectual property" blogs and the lack of rankings for trade mark blogs and patent blogs the reason for the IPKat's seemingly ever increasing focus on copyright law or is it just a happy coincidence?
ReplyDeleteCongrats!! Your followers are happier than ever! Thanks for so much work and generosity! Our enrichment is your glory!
ReplyDeleteGustavo Schötz, Argentina.
@Anonymous: It's just a coincidence. Unfortunately at the moment Justia is not providing rankings for patent- and trademark-focused blogs.
ReplyDelete@Gustavo: many thanks for your kind words!