As book review editor, this Kat has facilitated the review of over 50 books on IPKat since taking over the role. She hopes that readers find these reviews as interesting and helpful as she does! This year we've covered books of all type of IP from Patents, Trade Marks, and Copyright, on topics from Social Media to Mediation, and jurisdictions, from China and South Africa to France.
And now... drum roll please... to celebrate the vast and diverse offering of IP literature, the IPKat are excited to announce that we are holding our first IP Book of The Year competition!
Which IP books got you purring this year? You can nominate your favourites now. There are 6 categories of book that you can nominate- Patent, Copyright, Design, Trade Mark, General IP and Edited Collection.
 |
| So many books, so little time! PHoto: H. Wechsler |
Nominations close at midnight on Sunday 23rd December 2018.
The books that received the most nominations will be shortlisted, following which readers will be able to vote for their winners!
Only books published in 2018 and fall within the categories listed above will be considered. You may nominate as many books as you like, but please only nominate each title once per person. In your nominations please include the author, title, and publisher.
On the 12th Day of Christmas IPKat Gave to Me...IP Book of the Year Nominees!
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
Rating:
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn ![[Guest post] Can AI be considered a PHOSITA? Policy debates in the US and the EU](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggxDO6mW5r4n3-06Af5ckmIaMIhzgPJBoDP8AUsSYXY2zajUQt1ObGVn_GhCgidbG_YDVnybQuJ5XoAjjBG9Ws2xJWDQHNPMrLkn526SWIG371X_Kjt1E8tJmn8Ae_20Phyphenhyphen09JeuUOhhTR3aZE9lMRQlqHGQGcAWGxlo91rrKcLk0AfUjWCvw6RQ/s72-c/Two-cats-eating.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html