In a couple of recent Trade Mark Registry decisions (here and here) the examiner has refused to register the word JESUS as a trade mark for various classes of goods (none of which were inherently controversial) because he considered its use as a trade mark to be contrary to public policy or the accepted principles of morality under s.3(3)(a) of the Trade Marks Act. Although there were a few people in the UK whose surname was JESUS and in some other countries it is a popular forename, in the UK only a small minority would view it as an ordinary surname or forename. Instead, its primary significance in the UK, where a substantial number of people believe in the Christian faith, are taught the subject in schools and worship in Church, was as the name of the religious figure and as such its use as a trade mark would cause offence that went beyond mere distaste. That offence was caused by the resultant undermining of “an accepted social and religious value” to a significant extent because many believe that JESUS is the name of JESUS CHRIST who is believed by Christians to be the Son of God and as such, whose name should not be debased by use as a trade mark for the applied for goods.
Little-known fact: there are 27 people with the surname JESUS in the London Telephone Directory
Little-known fact: there are 27 people with the surname JESUS in the London Telephone Directory
HEAVENS ABOVE
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Tuesday, August 05, 2003
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html