IPKat’s patent of the month (found on Patently Absurd) is a must for the dog that has everything. Tired of your dog carelessly dipping his ears in his dinner? Are your fido’s follicles filled with food? Then invest in a pair of these rather lovely ear protectors.
According to the specification:
“This invention provides a device for protecting the ears of animals, especially long-haired dogs, from becoming soiled by the animal's food while the animal is eating. The device provides a generally tubular shaped member for containing and protecting each ear of the animal, and a member to position the tubular member and animal ears away from the mouth and food of the animal while it is eating.”
Learn about the dog genome project here
Meet today’s dog of the day here
Canine comedy here
Fido philosophy here and here
Dog blog here
According to the specification:
“This invention provides a device for protecting the ears of animals, especially long-haired dogs, from becoming soiled by the animal's food while the animal is eating. The device provides a generally tubular shaped member for containing and protecting each ear of the animal, and a member to position the tubular member and animal ears away from the mouth and food of the animal while it is eating.”
Learn about the dog genome project here
Meet today’s dog of the day here
Canine comedy here
Fido philosophy here and here
Dog blog here
IPKAT PATENT OF THE MONTH: AUGUST 2003
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Friday, August 01, 2003
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html